perm filename NOFT1.VL[1,VDS] blob
sn#193841 filedate 1975-12-24 generic text, type C, neo UTF8
COMMENT ⊗ VALID 00002 PAGES
C REC PAGE DESCRIPTION
C00001 00001
C00002 00002 \|\\M1BDR30\M2SIGN57\M3NGR25\M4NGR20\F2\CVICARM
C00012 ENDMK
C⊗;
\|\\M1BDR30;\M2SIGN57;\M3NGR25;\M4NGR20;\F2\CVICARM
\F3\C154 EAST DANA STREET
\CMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA. 94041
\F4\←L\-R\/'7;\+R\→.\→S Telephone:
\←S\→.415-965-0557
\F1\CDecember 22, 1975
Mr. Russell Noftsker
Pertron Controls Corp.
15904 Strathern St. Suite 5
Van Nuys, CA 91406
Dear Russ:
\J
This letter is sent in response to your letter of December 1.
I'd like to start with a status report on the electronics you
designed and built for Vicarm.
As of today, we have not yet shipped the manipulator system.
This is primarily because we have not yet succeeded in making your
electronics operate properly. You should know that as delivered to
us your electronics was not operational. Modifications have been
required to every card delivered or designed. This includes the
servo cards, the driver cards, the brake cards, and the manual
control card. As of this moment we are still working on amplifier
stability problems. A suitable solution to this may even require a
new driver card for the current system, and certainly a new one for
future systems. We have yet to even attempt to adjust the servos to
meet response and overshoot requirements.
In December of 1974, I approached you about the possibilities
of your assisting me with the design of a servo system for the model
Stanford arm. At that time, I already had a quote from Dave Bailey
on position servo and driver cards to supplement the control and
logic cards already developed by him. I had even begun construction
of the chassis and power supplies. You stated that you could take
over the task of making this system work, and could accomplish the
job in a matter of weeks (I remember your estimates as mentioning
February or March. Not only that, you assured me that the costs
would be comparable with the prices Dave Bailey was quoting. In
fact, you agreed that it would be a good idea to use Dave Bailey's
digital control and analog cards. I even purchased these for use.
Since that time, only two systems have been built. Neither
one came anywhere close to being a really deliverable unit as
completed by you. The N.B.S. unit should never have been shipped,
and I have had to promise them another unit. They even claim to be
afraid to use the system, because of the many small operating
problems. Likewise, with the G.M. arm system. We believed you when
you assured us that your designs were debugged, thoroughly tested and
could be relied upon to work with a minimum of debugging. We even
made up P.C. cards to your drawings. Well, the sad fact is that we
are presently making over the brake and manual control cards, and are
seriously thinking of redesigning the driver card. All this will
have to be done before shipment of the G.M. order.
Vicarm invested a lot of time, money, effort and prestige in
this effort to develop an arm driver unit. We realize that you
too put in a large effort. But we also realize that a good part of
this effort was related to duplication of already developed areas,
such as the brake logic and switching logic. In addition, you spent
much time repetitively debugging and fixing p.c. cards which should
have been debugged in breadboard stage. In spite of the fact that
Vicarm provided you with a power supply and sample motor, you never
did show us a complete breadboard of anything. We trusted your
statements that everything was going to work in short order, and in
fact, assisted you by fabricating some boards ourselves to speed
things up.
You have sent us a bill. This December 1 bill is the first
formal bill you have sent since agreeing to help us make this system. On
numerous occaisions prior to now, I asked you to price things out.
During this past year, besides some individual components bills, you
gave me only one price. That price was $200 per joint for delivery
of the complete servo for an arm. I questioned you on what this
included and I understood it to mean that you would deliver a
completely tested servo card, a completely tested driver card, and a
completely tested power transistor assembly, all mounted on a
heatsink with the backplane wired. Counting seven (7) joints per arm,
that would be $1,400 per arm for those units. Well, I thought your
price reasonable... in fact maybe too reasonable. And by your bill,
it seems that you now have second afterthoughts, as your price is
roughly three times what I thought you had in mind. Not only that,
you are quoting roughly three times that price for future systems,
(or else the price of the power supply, cabinet and brake logic is
astronomical).
Well, I have discussed your bill and services with Brian, and
others, and Vicarm feels that your bill is out of line, considering
the state of the delivered work, and the effort required on Vicarm's
part to secure what was eventually delivered, and the effort required
to actually sell your work. Thus, Vicarm is prepared to pay you what
we feel is a fair sum for the net result of your effort. Vicarm will
pay you $4,500 for all you have done to date, providing you agree to return
the power supply, motors, and all other items loaned to you from
Vicarm, and also deliver 5 copies of the Servo Card and Driver Card
schematics to us.
Upon reciept of a letter from you agreeing to this sum as payment in
full for all expenses and services rendered to date, Vicarm will
immediately mail you a check for $3,000 ($4,500 - $1,500 already
paid). We look forward to hearing from you shortly.\.
\←L\→S\←R\-L\/'2;\+L\→L
Yours sincerely,
Victor Scheinman
President
\←S\→L
VDS:pdp10